Episode F31 — Breach of Trust and Exploiting Weakness

Episode Summary
This episode explains how breach of trust, abuse of authority, vulnerability, or dependence can become relevant to fraud law as "other fraudulent means." Fraud is not always based on a direct lie or false document. In some cases, the dishonest conduct comes from using a position of trust, confidence, control, or influence to expose another person's economic interests to deprivation or risk. The episode carefully distinguishes criminal fraud from civil breach of duty, professional negligence, relationship breakdown, ethical misconduct, and ordinary disputes. It focuses on the relationship between the parties, what was entrusted, what authority existed, how that authority was used, and whether the accused person knew the conduct could cause economic harm. For investigators, the episode provides a practical method for analyzing relationship-based financial exploitation, elder fraud, employee misuse, public-sector trust, and other files involving vulnerability or dependence.
What You'll Learn
- • How abuse of trust can become relevant to fraud
- • Why fraud does not always require a direct lie
- • How vulnerability and dependence fit into economic harm analysis
- • How to distinguish civil breach of duty from Criminal Code fraud
Key Investigator Takeaways
- • Identify the relationship, authority, and property or money entrusted
- • Prove how trust was used to create economic risk or deprivation
- • Build the file around records, communications, control, concealment, and accused knowledge
Cases Discussed
Visual Mind Map
Transcript
Show transcript
Episode F31 explores Breach of Trust and Exploiting Weakness for Canadian fraud investigators…